This was a lesson I did with my Proficiency group towards the end of the last academic year. It’s inspired by a podcast episode and general discussions about science and diversity, particularly the number of women who leave science at various points. The PowerPoint shows the structure of the lesson:
The part of the lesson the students responded best to was sharing their drawings of four different people for the first activity. After they’d shared them, I asked how many were male and how many were female, and whether that surprised them at all. Considering we had a female scientist as one of the students in the group, only one picture out of twenty showed a woman! The statistics also prompted a lot of discussion.
As a mini language focus, we looked at how the four different biographies were structured in an attempt for me to figure out how to get more discourse in my lessons. Here’s what I said:
- Peggy Whitson: almost every sentence has a background > result/event structure.
- Marie Tharp: there’s a lot of potentially emotive emphatic language like controversial, dismissed, painstakingly etc.
- Wanda Diaz-Merced: a straightforward narrative in order of events.
- Quarraisha Abdool Karim: a list of some of her achievements.
Discourse is not something I know much about, so please feel free to give me more technical information about this! Based on this, students could choose a female scientist to write their own biography about, using one of these structures as a possible framework.
We only spent a very brief time on the final activity about possible solutions as the plan actually took nearly two whole lessons.
I’d be interested to know how it goes down with your students if you choose to use it, and what you would add or change.